[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: oilheads-digest V1 #49
- Subject: Re: oilheads-digest V1 #49
- From: rennsport@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 08:41:41 -0500
On Tuesday, Jan 13, 2004, at 08:12 US/Eastern, Mike Eyre wrote:
>>
>
> Not needed? Why not? We're all familiar that the pushrod motor is an
> old
> design, but old doesn't always mean inferior or useless..
Yes it has its uses. In a car or truck.
> A pushrod
> generally allows a more compact engine. Compact (small, lightweight) is
> always a good thing in a motorcycle, no? Think of the new Corvette
> engine.. Still a pushrod engine, but a damned nice one at that.
>
Well lets not confuse a massive V8 with a motorcycle powerplant.
If the pushrod motor offers such a weight advantage, why is the sport
bike world not using them? Answer: I don't think a pushrod engine will
rev to 14,000 RPMs.
Also compact does not necessarily mean less weight.
Robert
95 R11RS
88 KRS Special
------------------------------