[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Anything but linked brakes
- Subject: Re: Anything but linked brakes
- From: Wayne Woodruff <wayne@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 18:56:20 -0500
touche' I missed the 'not'. duh.
PMS. I need a fix ... bad. too much time at the
keeeyyyyybbboooaaarrddd. heellllpppp. :)
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:11:24 -0500, you wrote:
>Wayne, I have no problem with you busting my chops. Butt! In looking
>at my statement, I think the grammar is correct. I'm no English major,
>but I said I did not agree with the Most statement. At least you got
>the point anyway. (Just busting your chops, by the way). ;-)) And
>here is the grin to prove it.
>
>Bob Hadden '98RS
>
>On Feb 20, 2004, at 1:40 PM, Wayne Woodruff wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:44:17 -0500, Bob wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure I agree with the MOST oilheads statement. My impression
>>> is that most of these bikes surge to one degree or another as
>>> delivered.
>>
>> Ummm, didn't you just contradict yourself? Your agreeing with the
>> statement that most do not surge, and then follow on with a statement
>> that they most do surge. I get your point, I'm just busting your
>> chops.
------------------------------