[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Spark plug socket
- Subject: RE: Spark plug socket
- From: "Clive Liddell" <cliddell@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:26:46 +0200
Marco,
Interesting information but I would not trust "turn of nut/bolt" alone. You
have to pre-torque to seat everything and then the angle-torque would be
quite accurate for THAT application. This is because you are applying a
fixed distance to the nut/bolt and the length of bolt would affect how much
stretching it would affect the clamping force.
Regards
Clive Liddell
Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
'96 R850R ~75kkm
'01 R1100RT ~55kkm
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-oilheads@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-oilheads@xxxxxxxxx]On
> Behalf Of Marco S Hyman
> Sent: 07 February, 2005 02:44
> To: oilheads@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Spark plug socket
>
>
> gator@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
> > Just my .02 but I think that is the most rediculass thing I
> can think of.
>
> Hmmm, you might be surprised. There's a table on page 1404 of
> Machinery's
> Handbook 25 that notes the accuracy of bolt preload methods. They list:
>
> By feel +/- 35%
> Torque Wrench +/- 25%
> Turn-of-nut +/- %15%
> Preload indicating washer +/- 10%
> Strain Guages +/- 1%
> etc.
>
> > Might be a good gouge when you don't have a torque wrench, as
> is the tool
> > kit when you don't have real tools..
>
> If the handbook is to be believed the turn-of-nut method is more accurate
> than a typical torque wrench (when both are used by a typical mechanic :-)
>
> // marc
------------------------------