[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Belt Drives
- Subject: Re: Belt Drives
- From: Bruno Valeri <bvaleri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:09:45 -0400
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Minor, Bob" <Bminor@xxxxxxxx>
To: <oilheads@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, September 12, 2005 1:21 PM
Subject: RE: Belt Drives
> Here's a claim from an outfit that does conversions. I know, I know,
> where's the DATA?
>
> "Typical chain efficiency is approx. 80% when new, and deteriorates
> throughout it's life. Typical belt efficiency is approx. 98% throughout
> its entire lifespan. Due to change of pulley ratios, the engine RPMs are
> reduced by 28% @ 60 mph. Feels like you have a 6th gear!"
>
I'm not an expert in this area, but this seems wrong to me. From what I
know, chain drive is the most efficient.
But as the chain wears, efficiency decreases somewhat whereas a belt drive
remains stable.
But heck, I've been wrong before. <G>
Bruno
Montreal, Canada
Road test reviews
http://tinyurl.com/a34cf
------------------------------