[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (OT) BMW designs interior for revolutionary jet
- Subject: Re: (OT) BMW designs interior for revolutionary jet
- From: "Steve Makohin" <wateredg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2006 15:18:51 -0400
Hello,
From: <PGK75S@xxxxxxx>
> In a message dated 8/21/06 12:25:06 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
> wateredg@xxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
> << BMW's iDrive is absent, though a fully automated and fully integrated
> "glass cockpit" demonstrates how technology can indeed simplify complex
> tasks, and increase safety. >>
>
> Thank goodness they didn't attempt an "iFly" control, I can see the
> aircraft
> now falling off into the legendary "graveyard spiral" as the pilot tries
> to
> get thru the "iFly" menu ;o)
On a serious note, BMW introduced iDrive for the primary purpose of
decluttering the dashboard. It excels at doing that. BMW also added a host
of questionable functionality into iDrive, such as letting the user specify
how long the headlights stay on after they shut the engine off , using
1-second increments across a very, very broad range of values. As a result
of these decisions, iDrive has introduced a number of issues that make it
suboptimal for real-time user control of the system, and in my opinion,
unnecessary risk in safe vehicle operation.
In contrast, Eclipse Aviation introduced "Avio" (that's the "glass cockpit"
and it's related functionality) with the primary purpose of reducing pilot
workload (which is different than decluttering the dashboard) thereby
simplifying vehicle operation, and increasing safety. A side-effect of these
two goals was a less cluttered, but much better organized cockpit. In order
to pull this off, they had to use 3 large displays, on which virtual gauges
and controls appear (i.e., it is a digital simulation of an analog world,
and humans are analog creatures, after all).
I find it interesting how two things that appears to be similar on the
surface (Avio glass cockpit and iDrive) are so radically different, and that
one turns out to be a noteworthy success (Avio) while the other ends up
being a lamented disappointment (iDrive, still being bashed, in spite of
multiple major revisions).
- -Steve Makohin
'01 R1100S/ABS
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
------------------------------
End of oilheads-digest V3 #135
******************************