[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ohlins Rebuild
- Subject: Re: Ohlins Rebuild
- From: BeemerGary2@xxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 12:23:41 EST
In a message dated 12/7/2003 7:46:11 AM Pacific Standard Time,
This thread about Ohlin rebuilds begs the more fundamental question of does
the replacement of BMW stock shocks with Ohlins change/improve the ride of
the bike enough to warrant the outlay of what-- $1300+ for a front and rear?
I thought I had addressed this matter in my post of 12/2 to Bob Silas, but as
usual I probably used too many words and talked all around the subject
without addressing it directly. So, here goes again and I hope I get it right this
IMO, the significantly improved quality of of ride and handling offered by
Ohlins or any other brand new aftermarket shock is not worth the $1300 or so
outlay to replace brand new stock shocks. That's the black and white of the
matter. However, as with anything else, there are shades of gray that can influence
a decision. Here is what I consider to be the gray area.
It has been my experience with street bikes (not racing or dirt bikes), that
ANY shock is going to lose the greater portion of it efficiency and
effectiveness at about the 30,000 mile mark. If you have been using the stock shock, you
are then faced with an outlay of $1300 or so for an aftermarket shock. If you
have been using one of the aftermarket shocks that can be rebuilt, you are
faced with an outlay of $100 or so per shock for a rebuild. The point is that if
you are going to be keeping your bike for more than about 30K miles, and wish
to keep the ride and handling as effective and efficient as possible, then
the outlay of the aforementioned $1300 or so is inevitable.
For example, let's assume two BMW riders who buy new street bikes at the same
time. Both riders will end up keeping their bikes for 50,000 miles.
Rider 'A' chooses to keep the stock shocks for 30,000 miles. At the end of
that time, the steadily decreasing effectiveness of the shocks has reached the
point where it is interfering with the rider's enjoyment of the bike. Rider 'A'
then shells out $1300 or so for a set of aftermarket shocks and enjoys their
improved performance for the remainder of the bike's life in his hands.
Rider 'B' chooses to replace the stock shocks with a set of aftermarket
shocks shortly after the new bike purchase. Although their inherent out-of-the-box
performance is clearly superior to the stock shocks, they are still going to
deteriorate over time and use with the 30,000 mile mark being the point where
they will be rebuilt. Rider 'B' then shells out $100 or so per shock to have
them rebuilt, and enjoys their inherent superior performance for the remainder
of the bike's life in his hands.
So, when both rider's get rid of their bikes at 50,000 miles:
1.) They have both popped for a new set of aftermarket shocks at a cost of
$1300 or so.
2.) It cost Rider 'B' an additional $100 or so per shock for the rebuilds at
the 30K mile mark. The tradeoff however, is that Rider 'B' got to enjoy the
superior ride and handling characteristics of the aftermarket shocks for 50,000
miles versus Rider 'A' who experienced this same enjoyment for only 20,000.
Fade to announcer:
The story you have just seen was based on actual circumstances. Only the
names have been changed to protect me. (Dum da dum dum!) (Followed by sound of
hammer striking anvil). :-)
Rider 'A' was me with my '95 R1100GS. In actual fact, I rode that bike for
86K miles and had the aftermarket shocks rebuilt at about the 60K mile mark.
Rider 'B' is also me with my '04 R1150GS. This is an ongoing saga.
Hope this helps,
Mission Viejo, CA