[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: oilheads-digest V1 #54
- Subject: Re: oilheads-digest V1 #54
- From: Steve Makohin <wateredg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2004 12:49:31 -0500
On 1/9/04 12:00 PM, rennsport@xxxxxxxxx rennsport@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>On Thursday, Jan 8, 2004, at 09:55 US/Eastern, Edward Begley wrote:
>
>> I'm an aircraft mechanic where engines have to be reliable.
>> Interestly they still have air cooled opposed engines with
>> pushrods a foot long or more
>
>What rpm do those engines turn, 3000? There is no need for overhead
>cams and such.
Yup, around 2700 RPM for a piston single is considered to be "ear
splitting" revving. But just as a "data point", GA (General Aviation)
aircraft have not evolved anywhere nearly as rapidly as automobiles have,
not because there wasn't a need or a use, but because of the extreme
rigors through which GA manufacturers have to go to introduce a change of
virtually any sort. The certification process is extremely rigorous and
expensive. This explains why "FADEC" is a turn-of-the-21st-Century
buzzword in GA, "Fully Automated Digital Electronic Control" (commonly
known as "Fuel Injection" in cars and bikes). It has only begun to appear
in significant numbers in GA in the past few years.
As Edward Begley, an aircraft mechanic, will tell you, GA aircraft are
optimized to be reliable, and to reduce risk failure. Big, pushrod, air
cooled, "old tech" engines can be extremely reliable.
Aside, and some light pilot humor: Would you fly an airplane if it was
built by Harley-Davidson? ;-)
- -Steve
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
2000 R1100S/ABS, Mandarin
------------------------------