[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autolite 3923 washer
- Subject: Re: Autolite 3923 washer
- From: Tpcutter@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 08:45:02 EST
In a message dated 11/10/05 11:46:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
BeemerGary2@xxxxxxx writes:
<<Tom, Tom, Tom,
You are answering questions like a politician. You are totally avoiding one
of the questions and attempting to redirect the focus on the other.>>
OK, I'll take them in your order...
<<Permit me to refresh your memory:
My first question in response to your statement: "DO NOT apply Anti-Seize to
spark plug threads. You will end up overtorquing the plug and stripping out
the thread in the head" was:
1) <<If one uses a Torque Wrench and tightens the plug to the recommended
torque setting (10 Nm for instance), how can the threads be stripped,
regardless
of whether or not an anti-seize compound is used?>>
A torque wrench measures turning force, not clamping force. We just went
through this on the AirList a few weeks ago, so excuse me if I am a little
impatient with it. Changing the sliding resistance of a thread by adding
lubrication changes the clamping force obtained with the same turning force.
Therefore, if you lubricate a thread, you MUST adjust your torque wrench setting
accordingly. Engineering manuals seem to waver on the exact amount, somewhere
between 25 and 30%. Therefore, if you lubricate the thread with Anti-Seize, then
use your torque wrench to turn the spark plug to the same WRENCH SETTING that
is recommended for non-lubricated threads, you will end up putting about
25-30% more force on the threads. In an aluminum cylinder head, the threads will
start to distort or "pull" at that level, and they will fail at about 40%
overtorque. I am not an engineer, but I know this is true, because I have to
repair stripped, anti-seize-coated spark plug threads quite frequently.
To recap, since you seeem to miss stuff when I state it subtly: If you
lubricate the thread, you must REDUCE your torque wrench setting by about 25-30%.
Now comes the hard part. Anti-Seize gets forced into the aluminum threads
and is almost impossible to remove. So even if you decide to day to stop
putting Anti-Seize on the threads in your bike, where you previously used it, it
will remain there for years. That means that you must rigidly control ALL other
persons who have reason to service the spark plugs of that motorcycle
forever. That just doesn't happen. And that is when I see the problem. Some guy
buys a used bike and decides he will screw with the spark plugs, because he
thinks he know something about them. So he takes out the plugs and does whatever
he wants, and goes to put them back in, torquing them to the torque
recommended in the bootlegged Service Manual CD that he bought on Ebay. The threads
begin to fail, because he doesn't know that he is dealing with
previously-lubricated threads. This is a VERY common issue with BMWs.
BMW owners think they know everything, because they read it in books of
questionable value. Haynes and Clymers manuals are notorious for misinformation,
and the anti-seize recommendation that they make is but one of many
potentially damaging recommendations that they make. They have writers who sprinkle
"common knowledge" aphorisms like "put a dab of anti-seize on the threads"
throughout their publications.
<<I really expected to see your answer to that question, which you avoided
completely, before you responded with demonstrated obfuscation to the
question I
posed to your statement: "Many spark plug makers specifically say not to use
Anti-Seize", which was:
2) <<Specifically, who might that be, and by what means is this information
transmitted from these manufacturers to the end users?>>
As recently as three years ago, Bosch, NGK and Champion all specifically
stated in their websites to NOT use anti-Seize on spark plugs. For some reason
that I cannot begin to guess, they have removed those recommendations. So that
is the who and how.
<<Providing me with your "Elephant Dung" analogy was really a crappy
response
and one that dodges the answers to my specific questions.>>
Not really. It made the point, which you clearly missed. But your response
above WAS funny.
<<Directing me to "Search their websites for Installation Tips" is telling
me
that I should go to the effort of proving that what you say is correct or
incorrect when I am questioning the authority with which you have made some
questionable (to me) statements. That is akin to a journalist making a
statement and
expecting the reader/listener/viewer prove or disprove the validity of the
journalist's statement, when the principle of journalistic integrity places
the
burden of proof on the journalist.>>
You are right, Gary. I should provide a complete set of footnotes to every
post that I make on this and every list to which I post. You should be saved
the trouble of looking for information that I should have provided for your
amusement and convenience. After all, I have nothing better to do with my time.
You asked who and where, I told you "the spark plug manufacturers" and
"Their websites and the Installation Tips." Sorry for being so obtuse. I really
have no right to expect you to look up the answers you demand.
<<You have stated that you "started to do a search" but ran into websites
from
AutoLite and Champion that were the same. Okay, I looked at those websites,
and ya-sure-ya-bet'cha, they were the same. SO WHAT? They did no more to
answer
the questions I have asked than you have done?>>
That was an "aside", i.e. an interesting tidbit that I encountered while
searching for some other stuff. It was not intended to bolster my argument in
any way. It was just an interesting observation.
<<You then directed me, as well as all other readers of this thread, to a
Saturn Service Campaign which reputedly stated: "If anti-sieze compound is
used and
spark plugs are over-torqued, damaged to the cylinder head threads may
result." DUH, YEAH! If ANY thread is over torqued by some ham fisted shade
tree
mechanic who doesn't know a torque specification for an octane rating, it's
more
than likely to get stripped. What does this have to do with whether or not
anti-seize compound is applied to the threads when the manufacturer's
recommended
torque value is followed by someone using a torque wrench?(Refer to question
#1). And it still does not answer question #2 regarding the alleged
recommendation of spark plug manufacturers. >>
Again, you missed the point that both I AND Saturn make. When you lubricate
a thread, the torque CHANGES. Then threads will fail. This was not a warning
for the ham-fisted. it was a warning for the very careful guy who always sets
his torque wrench to the factory spec and then decides, ON HIS OWN
INITIATIVE, to smear some goop on to the threads, despite NO suggestion by the vehicle
or spark plug maker to do so. Then he cranks the plug in there, believing,
as you clearly do, that he is doing things perfectly, not realizing that he
just caused damage.
<<Please Tom, rather than dance around the questions I have asked in
response
to statements you have made, just answer them directly. In the past, I have
really enjoyed your input to this List and have accepted your statements as
being
credible. I expect that I am not the only reader of this List who feels the
same way. >>
Gary, the problem with this issue is that you are so dead-set convinced that
you are right in using Anti-Seize on your plugs, you just cannot accept that
it may be the wrong thing to do. It's OK, it is your bike, and they are your
spark plugs. I'll keep a supply of Heli-Coil inserts handy when you are
ready for them.
<<Please don't burst my bubble, and possibly that of others, by
continuing to answer these rather simple and straightforward questions as
though you
were running for office. >>
I answered the question in the first post. You just chose to not see it
because you are blinded by your preconception.
<<Of course, you could ignore this matter entirely, leaving me and possibly
others to our own conclusions.>>
Here's a conclusion you can draw, Gary. There are damn few experienced BMW
motorcycle mechanics willing to share their accumulated experience with the
public, freely and with no expectation of return or compensation. The main
reason is that blowhards and blusterers tend to attack them and drive them away.
You, and "possibly others" can conclude that for sure.
Tom Cutter
Yardley, PA
http://www.RubberChickenRacingGarage.com
------------------------------