[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The Low-Down on Bike ABS, Linked and EVO Brakes
- Subject: Re: The Low-Down on Bike ABS, Linked and EVO Brakes
- From: "Steve Makohin" <wateredg@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 14:25:32 -0400
Hello Wayne,
From: "Wayne Woodruff" <wayne@xxxxxxxxx>
> You state the following:
>
> "Maximum stopping power, that is the greatest rate of deceleration, can
> be attained just *before* a wheel locks up."
>
> I would argue that the maximum coefficient of friction is when the
> wheel *is* locked up, therefore, the greatest rate of deceleration.
>
> Comments?
(1) On a motorcycle, it's a moot point, as the front wheel provides most of,
and up to 100% of the stopping power, and a locked front wheel spells a high
dropability of a dropped bike. (Most folks will want to hit the delete
button now)
(2 ) I can provide only a layman's response. Those seeking one in terms of
physics should run off to the library and start reading.
(3) People will have observed apparent contractions to this, such as
Q:: Does a car stop quicker on snow with a lockup? Why?
A: Yes, because the locked tire collects snow in front of the tire, which
packs, and acts like a mini chock.
Q: All other things being equal, can a car in full lockup stop quicker
than a car with ABS? Why?
A: Yes, because ABS is not designed to stop a car quicker. It is designed
to prevent loss of vehicular control, its primary function. ABS does
not
attempt to keep the brakes at threshold, but rather, it works to
keep
the car controllable, which sacrifices ultimate braking power that
could
be attained through threshold braking.
So why is ABS on a bike *apparently* different than on a car? Because a
front wheel lockup in a bike results in the virtually certain, virtually
immediate loss of control, followed by a dropped bike, which increases the
risks of personal injury. Riders fearing this typically do not apply their
brakes anywhere close to the traction limits, therefore not making the best
use of their brakes and needlessly increasing stopping distances. Other
riders err by over-applying brakes, locking, and dropping the bike.
In your search for why the best stopping power is attained just before wheel
lockup as opposed to during fully locked wheels (i.e., a skid), realize this
is not an "ABS vs no ABS" comparison, because ABS is well short of keeping
the wheels at the threshold of lockup. That's the reason why there are some
exceptional scenarios in which a really good braker can get shorter stopping
distances on a non-ABS bike than with an ABS bike. But back to your
statement: When you hit the text books in your research, pay particular
attention to "static" friction. That's for the theory, at least.
In practice, other factors play a part, such as how much grip the rubber
provides in relation to temperature. Most riders know that cold tires offer
less grip than hot tires. The same applies in a stop. During a skid, a tire
heats up more to provide potentially more stopping power as compares to a
much cooler tire which is not skidding. But again, this is a moot point on a
bike where a skid is bad news.
- -Steve Makohin
'01 R1100S/ABS
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
------------------------------